Skip to content

AIS-105

Site-safety scenario video studio

Limited risk (transparency)Provider and deployer (reclassified art.25)4/61 obligations

Already applicable: art.4 AI literacy and the art.50 transparency duties. Compliance is owed from placement, not from a future date. The art.50 transparency duties have applied since 2 August 2026. A system or model first placed on the market on or after that date must comply from placement — there is no separate future transition deadline.

⚠ Problems to check before validating (0)

None. The register raises no warning on this row — which is not the same as a validated row: a human still signs it off.

How this was decided

  1. CMYes — An AI system, with an art.2 connecting factor to the EU, and no exemption claimed.[CJ, CK, CL]From your answers to: Q1.1 — Does the tool produce predictions, content, recommendations or decisions — rather than simply displaying, storing or computing data? ; Q1.2 — Does the tool produce those outputs by LEARNING from data, or by applying a model — rather than by running rules a person wrote? ; Q1.3 — Does the output INFLUENCE something — a physical environment, a workflow, a document, a decision — rather than just sitting there? ; Q1.4 — Does the tool work on its own to some degree, producing its output without a person specifying every step? ; Q2.1 — Where is the tool used, and where are the people or the outputs it affects? (tick all that apply) ; Q2.2 — Does the tool fall into any of these cases?
  2. FLimited risk (transparency) — Not high-risk, but art.50 transparency duties apply: people must be told they are dealing with AI, or that content was generated by it.[DO, DT]From your answers to: Q8.2 — Does the tool generate or manipulate content — text, images, audio or video? ; Q8.7 — Does the tool generate or manipulate images, audio or video that resemble real people, objects, places, entities or events, and that would falsely appear to someone to be authentic or truthful — a deep fake?

Obligations that apply (4 of 61; 57 ruled out)

art.4 applies to every provider and deployer of any AI system in scope, whatever its risk level, and — on the value-chain reading of recital 20 — to a provider of a general-purpose AI model: the people who operate and are affected by it must have a sufficient level of AI literacy. (A GPAI model is not literally an "AI system", so the strict text is arguable; the register takes the broad, fail-safe reading, and this note flags it as such.)

  • art.4AI literacy (art.4)

The system generates or manipulates synthetic content beyond assistive standard editing. art.50(2) requires the output to be marked machine-readably as artificially generated.

  • art.50(2)Mark synthetic content machine-readable (art.50(2))

The system produces deep-fake image, audio or video content. art.50(4), first subparagraph, requires disclosure that the content has been artificially generated or manipulated.

  • art.50(4), 1st subparagraphDisclose deep fake content (art.50(4), 1st subparagraph)

    The obligation still applies: the content must be disclosed as artificially generated or manipulated. Because it forms part of an evidently artistic, creative, satirical or fictional work, art.50(4) limits that disclosure to making the existence of the generated content known in a manner that does not hamper the display or enjoyment of the work (recital 134). art.50(5) still governs how it is done — clearly, distinguishably, and no later than the first exposure. This holds only where the content is WHOLLY of that character: where an informative and a creative character combine, the informative one prevails and standard disclosure applies.

At least one art.50 transparency duty applies. art.50(5) governs HOW it must be discharged: clearly and distinguishably, at the latest at the first interaction or exposure, and accessibly.

  • art.50(5)Provide the information clearly and distinguishably at the latest at first interaction or exposure, meeting accessibility requirements (art.50(5))

Compliance dates

  • Art.4 AI literacy have applied since 2 February 2025. A system or model first placed on the market on or after that date must comply from placement — there is no separate future transition deadline.
  • The art.50 transparency duties have applied since 2 August 2026. A system or model first placed on the market on or after that date must comply from placement — there is no separate future transition deadline.
  • No GPAI model obligations apply to this system.

Answers behind it

Q1 · What does THE COMPANY do with this tool?
THE COMPANY buys or subscribes to an external AI system, or a foundation model, for internal usage
Q2 · At go-live, whose name or trademark is on it?
—
[B] High-risk area — Annex III
No
Personal data present? (GDPR art.4)
No

One worked example under the register v11 rules. Fictional data; no account, nothing stored.